The objective of this Standard is to provide the rail industry with a set of signalling principles that will ensure the safe and efficient operation of a railway.
Frequently asked questions
The objective of this Standard is to provide the rail industry with a set of signalling principles that will ensure the safe and efficient operation of a railway.
This document sets out the key principles required to develop a safe and reliable signalling system and applies to all aspects of signalling and all systems of safeworking, regardless of the train detection method used. Although primarily intended for fixed‑block systems, the principles can also be applied to moving‑block designs. Each principle is supported by a rationale that explains the risks mitigated by applying the principle, requirements where specific actions are necessary to comply, and guidance where recommendations assist designers in meeting the intent of the principle.
The review of this document has confirmed alignment with current terminology and methodologies, resulting in minimal amendments and only a minor change impact on rail organisations. Key changes include alignment with the IRSE fundamental requirements for train control systems, updating the principles to ensure they remain technology agnostic, updating terminology to reflect current common practice and removing redundant information related to enforcement systems.
This document improves safety by providing signalling designers with a clear set of principles that ensure signalling systems manage the core risks associated with train movements and the protection of rail safety workers. By ensuring routes are safely controlled, indications are unambiguous and system behaviour is predictable, the signalling system can reliably support safe train operation. Interoperability is improved when adjoining rail infrastructure managers apply the same set of principles, allowing signalling systems at boundaries to operate consistently and with reduced complexity.
The product manages key risks such as routes not being properly set, locked or confirmed as clear before issuing a movement authority, indications that are ambiguous or unclear to train crews, collisions between rail vehicles, collisions with road vehicles and pedestrians at level crossings and unintended derailments that may arise from incorrect signalling logic or inadequate protections.
Implementation can be achieved by reviewing AS 7711 against existing internal standards, identifying areas of alignment and difference and updating organisational requirements to reference AS 7711 where alignment already exists. Where differences occur, organisations should assess whether AS 7711 offers better safety or harmonisation benefits when considered against internal risk profiles and SFAIRP obligations. If the standard provides improved outcomes, internal documents should be amended accordingly. If existing internal standards provide superior safety or operational outcomes, a derogation or deviation statement to AS 7711 may be required to document the rationale for retaining the organisation’s current approach.
Receive Updates
Click the button below to register for product updates
Register Now

